If you guys think or learnt that the Cloverfield monster was once used to be peaceful & innocent naturally newborn baby which was born NOT to intend any harm & is NOT aggressive/vicious at all Could it be all mankind's fault for being the most dangerous as compared to the creature (esp. of Manhattan, New York City where the Cloverfield monster takes place) are bad/the most dangerous creatures on Earth as compared to Cloverfield monster which is really a 300ft tall & is newly hatched & does NOT intend to attack human beings which turns out that its all their fault if they scare creature into rising from the sea where it lives & then terrorizes the city 'unintentionally', resulting the creature to separation anxiety while it turns out that the creature was merely mistaken as a threat & is that because the Tagruato ships disturbed the creature's slumber(obtaining resources) & is that why the creature is dead at the end of film could this be the result of mankind being more dangerous & scarier just like in the documentary film titled, The Age of Stupid?
Is the creature completely with its rampage which is unintentional mistaken as a threat & that it is all mankind's fault whuch turns out that mankind were a threat themselves?
If the creature was merely lost, scared & confused rather than being just out there killing.
Is there something fishy about the creature's backstory if the creature's rampage is not intentional & it does not mean any harm with the fear of violent instincts if it is all mankind's fault for being the most dangerous of all life on Earth as compared to the creature?
If someone were to find out/realize the creature was once innocent at 1st Would someone like Tagruato try to forbid another person from finding out that the creature used to be innocent at first so as to continue his buisiness for own selfish greed?
Could this be the relationship between the film, Age of Stupid & the film, Cloverfield?
So as to maintain his buisiness?